. . . more you can do on the above issue S. 1310 is currently "in committee." It is standard practice that when bills are introduced in either the Senate or the House of Representatives they are sent to a special committee made up of Senators (or Representatives) to study the bill and then come back to the whole group with recommendations. Since the committees receive hundreds of bills, many bills never get reviewed. Instead they "die in committee," and need to be reintroduced the following year. S. 1310 has been sent to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. If any of your state senators sit on this Committee, contact them and let them know of your opposition.  The members of the Committee are: Alaska - Lisa Murkowski (R) Arizona - John McCain (R) Colorado - Michael Bennet (D) Connecticut - Richard Blumenthal (D) (co-sponsor of S. 1310) Georgia - Johnny Isakson (R) Illinois - Mark Kirk (R) Iowa - Tom Harkin (D), Chairman of the Commit…

When “Junk Science” Is Used Against Supplements: What These Studies Really Show The supplement industry periodically finds itself under renewed scrutiny—often fueled by studies that appear to suggest vitamins and minerals are ineffective or even harmful. Recently, two widely cited studies have been used to reinforce this narrative, providing what some critics call “evidence” that supplements are unnecessary and that diet alone is sufficient for meeting nutrient needs. A closer look tells a very different story. A Climate of Scrutiny and Mistrust Regulatory pressure on supplements has intensified in recent years, with increased attention from the Food and Drug Administration and certain members of United States Congress—often framed as consumer protection, but viewed by many as disproportionately favoring pharmaceutical interests. Against this backdrop, any study questioning supplement safety or usefulness receives outsized attention. The Two Studie…